THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY LIMITED
- · Lifecycle stage: mature → zombie
- · Investment thesis: well_run_hard_buy → zombie_hold
- · Deal-killer verdict: clean → complicated
- · Opportunity score: 81 → 70
- · Lifecycle stage drifting downward
- · Currently "zombie"
Picture worsened over the last 30 days — 5 negative signals vs 0 positive.
- ↓Lifecycle stage: mature → zombie
- ·Investment thesis: well_run_hard_buy → zombie_hold
- ↓Deal-killer verdict: clean → complicated
- ↓Opportunity score: 81 → 70
- ↓Hygiene score: 90 → 80
- +1 more
No snapshot from 90 days ago — start tracking from today.
No snapshot from 180 days ago — start tracking from today.
Opportunity 70/100 (strong), bankability 75/100. Most likely exit: share sale to pe / searcher (58/100).
Data confidence
Overall: low (47/100)Sparse data coverage. Treat AI-generated outputs as preliminary. Manual diligence essential.
Solid opportunity signal. Worth a dedicated memo and management meeting.
Key financials
2 years extracted from filed iXBRL accountsHover to see exact values · click legend to toggle series
Financials
Extracted from Companies House accounts · FRS 102| Metric | 2025-03-31 | 2024-03-31 |
|---|---|---|
| Average employees | 0 | 0 |
Amounts extracted automatically from iXBRL. Fields left blank were not reported or not mapped. Values in GBP unless stated.
1 signal detected in this company's narrative notes — going-concern language, audit opinion, contingent liabilities, related-party transactions.
Available from the Pro tier upwards.
See pricing →Corporate timeline (1 events)Click to expand
- 2003-11-24🏢Company incorporatedAs THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY LIMITED
Owner dependency
Some founder dependency, but not acute. A structured handover period should cover most risk.
- +No director turnover: Company is 23 years old with no director changes — suggests a very tight-knit founder team never broadened.
Succession & seller-readiness
Limited succession signal. Not a near-term off-market candidate.
Red flags
cleanSimilar companies
Active · Other · KY postcode area| Company | Est. value | Turnover | Net worth | Staff | Age | Opp | Director |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOYDSLAW 103 LIMITED→ SC302937 · est 2006 · no financials extracted | — | — | — | — | 20y | 83 | 59y |
| PARKER KISLINGBURY LIMITED→ SC209915 · est 2000 · no financials extracted | — | — | — | — | 25y | 83 | 60y |
| BIRNIE LANDFILL LIMITED→ SC181761 · est 1997 | — | — | — | — | 28y | 82 | 65y |
| BRIGGS (OVERSEAS) LIMITED→ SC217945 · est 2001 | — | — | — | 0 | 25y | 82 | 87y |
| C R SMITH CONSERVATORIES LIMITED→ SC090652 · est 1984 · no financials extracted | — | — | — | — | 41y | 82 | 74y |
| THE VINE CHURCH LIMITED→ SC329580 · est 2007 · no financials extracted | — | — | — | — | 18y | 82 | 61y |
| FISHER & DONALDSON LIMITED→ SC032124 · est 1957 | — | — | — | 400 | 69y | 81 | 69y |
| LIBERTY LIGHTHOUSE LIMITED→ SC302278 · est 2006 · no financials extracted | — | — | — | — | 20y | 81 | 71y |
| METHIL DOCK NO. 3 ASSETS LIMITED→ SC182054 · est 1998 | — | — | — | 300 | 28y | 81 | 76y |
| SHARED CARE SCOTLAND→ SC161033 · est 1995 · no financials extracted | — | — | — | — | 30y | 81 | 70y |
| BALMUIR ESTATES NOMINEES LIMITED→ SC210639 · est 2000 | — | — | — | — | 25y | 80 | 78y |
| BERRYLAW FARMS LIMITED→ SC375857 · est 2010 | — | — | — | — | 16y | 80 | 63y |
6 specific questions generated from this company's actual signals — liquidity, leverage, director age, charge count, red flags, age-of-company.
Available from the Pro tier upwards.
See pricing →Exit-route ranking, improvement thesis, quiet-distress detector, covenant-pressure proxy, extraction monitor, approaching triggers, ownership drift, local cluster, value trap, debt capacity, archetype classification — 48+ scoring modules.
Available from the Pro tier upwards.
See pricing →