Companies House is rate-limiting or unreachable right now, so this page is showing the last data we hold on file. Officers, charges and filing history may be missing or out of date — refresh in a few minutes for live figures.
AQUILA DESIGN BOUTIQUE LIMITED
- · Deal-killer verdict: workable → complicated
- · Hygiene score: 70 → 60
- · PSC count: 1 → 0
- · 6 recent signals weakening vs 0 strengthening
Picture worsened over the last 30 days — 3 negative signals vs 0 positive.
- ↓Deal-killer verdict: workable → complicated
- ↓Hygiene score: 70 → 60
- ↓PSC count: 1 → 0
Picture worsened over the last 90 days — 3 negative signals vs 0 positive.
- ↓Deal-killer verdict: workable → complicated
- ↓Hygiene score: 70 → 60
- ↓PSC count: 1 → 0
No snapshot from 180 days ago — start tracking from today.
Opportunity 58/100 (worth a look), bankability 55/100. Biggest value-creation lever: Resolve: Confirmation statement overdue. Annual confirmation statement not filed on time. Required statutory filing — overdue is a strong discipline signal. Most likely exit: share sale to pe / searcher (58/100).
Data confidence
Overall: low (25/100)Sparse data coverage. Treat AI-generated outputs as preliminary. Manual diligence essential.
Mixed signal. Worth opening the full target workup before deciding to pursue.
Corporate timeline (1 events)Click to expand
- 2025-01-30🏢Company incorporatedAs AQUILA DESIGN BOUTIQUE LIMITED
Owner dependency
Some founder dependency, but not acute. A structured handover period should cover most risk.
- +Young company: Only 1.5 years old — management layer unlikely to be developed.
Succession & seller-readiness
Limited succession signal. Not a near-term off-market candidate.
Red flags
1 high ·Annual confirmation statement not filed on time. Required statutory filing — overdue is a strong discipline signal.
Evidence: Next due: 2026-02-12
Similar companies
Active · Professional services · G postcode area| Company | Est. value | Turnover | Net worth | Staff | Age | Opp | Director |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCGHEE GROUP LIMITED→ SC362390 · est 2009 | £20.62M £15.19M–£26.04M | — | — | — | 17y | 87 | 67y |
| I3WORKS LTD→ SC477423 · est 2014 | £16.71M £12.31M–£21.11M | £38.15M | — | 14200 | 12y | 92 | 61y |
| DOUGALL HOLDINGS LIMITED→ SC182259 · est 1998 | £15.47M £11.40M–£19.54M | — | — | 540 | 28y | 85 | 84y |
| 24/26 HOLDINGS LTD→ SC470528 · est 2014 | £4.81M £3.54M–£6.07M | — | — | 26 | 12y | 85 | 67y |
| INTERLOCK INVESTMENTS LIMITED→ SC057982 · est 1975 | £3.26M £2.40M–£4.11M | — | — | 20 | 51y | 85 | 72y |
| AKELA PLANT HIRE LTD→ SC313584 · est 2006 | — | — | £1.74M | — | 19y | 83 | 58y |
| ANDERSON KNIGHT LIMITED→ SC214850 · est 2001 | — | — | — | 2300 | 25y | 83 | 63y |
| BIO-IMAGES DRUG DELIVERY LTD→ SC383233 · est 2010 | — | — | — | 0 | 15y | 83 | 82y |
| BOSWELL MITCHELL & JOHNSTON LIMITED→ SC258273 · est 2003 | — | — | £3.06M | — | 22y | 83 | 59y |
| CARRICK HOLDINGS LIMITED→ SC011797 · est 1921 | — | — | £3.71M | — | 105y | 83 | 63y |
| CMA ARCHITECTS LIMITED→ SC357130 · est 2009 | — | — | — | 400 | 17y | 83 | 58y |
| CROFTWELL LIMITED→ SC061703 · est 1977 | — | — | — | 2 | 49y | 83 | 61y |
8 specific questions generated from this company's actual signals — liquidity, leverage, director age, charge count, red flags, age-of-company.
Available from the Pro tier upwards.
See pricing →Exit-route ranking, improvement thesis, quiet-distress detector, covenant-pressure proxy, extraction monitor, approaching triggers, ownership drift, local cluster, value trap, debt capacity, archetype classification — 48+ scoring modules.
Available from the Pro tier upwards.
See pricing →